{"id":8957,"date":"2021-05-28T14:25:40","date_gmt":"2021-05-28T14:25:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thepublicationplan.com\/?p=8957"},"modified":"2021-05-28T14:25:41","modified_gmt":"2021-05-28T14:25:41","slug":"study-reveals-lack-of-consistency-in-reporting-of-covid-19-related-preprints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thepublicationplan.com\/2021\/05\/28\/study-reveals-lack-of-consistency-in-reporting-of-covid-19-related-preprints\/","title":{"rendered":"Study reveals lack of consistency in reporting of COVID-19-related preprints"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Preprints<\/a> are used to expedite research findings into the public domain, but their inherent uncertainty is not well understood outside the scientific community. During the COVID-19<\/a> pandemic, the need for credible and accessible heath information caused a dramatic increase<\/a> in the use of preprints by media outlets. However, a recent study<\/a> published in Health Communication<\/em><\/a> found that almost half of 457 news articles from 15 media outlets that cited COVID-19-related preprints did not frame the preprint research as uncertain in any way.<\/p>\n

Using two preprint servers (medRxiv<\/a> and bioRxiv<\/a>), Altmetrics and coding, Dr Alice Fleerackers and colleagues analysed the use of COVID-19 preprints in the media coverage of the early months of the pandemic, and assessed if and how the uncertain nature of this type of research was explained. Although almost all the news stories hyperlinked to a preprint, there was great variation in how the preprint content was covered. While 80.5% identified the content mentioned as research, nearly 20% included a hyperlink with no explanation of where it linked to or indication that it linked to a preprint.<\/p>\n

Regardless of the use of hyperlinks, more than half of stories highlighted the scientific uncertainty associated with preprints, using a variety of framing devices, such as:<\/p>\n