{"id":7410,"date":"2020-10-06T16:10:26","date_gmt":"2020-10-06T16:10:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thepublicationplan.com\/?p=7410"},"modified":"2020-10-06T16:10:27","modified_gmt":"2020-10-06T16:10:27","slug":"going-beyond-authorship-redefining-research-recognition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thepublicationplan.com\/2020\/10\/06\/going-beyond-authorship-redefining-research-recognition\/","title":{"rendered":"Going beyond authorship: redefining research recognition"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Contributions to medical research have traditionally been defined by authorship and publication in journals. While this is important, it has many limitations. For example, conventions for listing contributions in a publication may fail to represent the full range of contributions made to the research. Additionally, other contributions vital for high quality research, such as peer reviewing, largely go unrecognised. A recent article from The Scholarly Kitchen examines the recent rise in new opportunities for acknowledging research contributions, and the potential benefits these may have for the scientific community.<\/p>\n

In 2014, Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) was developed to describe 14 roles commonly played by contributors to published scholarly output, with the aim of supporting adherence to the contributorship model and enhancing the transparency of research. Since its introduction, CRediT has been adopted by over 30 publishers including Cell Press, Elsevier and Springer.<\/p>\n

CRediT contributor roles include:<\/p>\n