- \n
- Inclusive publishing recognises the value of all validated research in enhancing scientific reproducibility and progress.<\/li>\n
- Publishers must embrace inclusive practices to reflect diversity within the scientific landscape.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thepublicationplan.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/AdobeStock_1620548942.jpeg?resize=1024%2C585&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\nInclusive journals value null results, preliminary data, and experimental design papers, which promote reproducibility<\/a> and can hasten innovation. Unlike selective journals, which prioritise \u2018high impact\u2019 discoveries, inclusive journals recognise that research does not need to be ground-breaking to be an advancement. In a Springer Nature article<\/a>, Ritu Dhand discusses the benefits of inclusive publishing.<\/p>\n
COVID-19: a case study <\/strong><\/p>\n
Dhand highlights how the COVID-19 crisis created an unprecedented need for peer-reviewed science. Journals responded<\/a> by adopting inclusive publishing practices, recognising the importance of preliminary data and innovative methods. The rapid dissemination of pilot studies and null results enabled scientists worldwide to focus precious time and effort on pushing unexplored frontiers. Inclusive publishing proved pivotal in an extraordinary global effort to compress drug discovery timelines from years to months. However, these inclusive practices faded after the pandemic.<\/p>\n
The price of selectivity <\/strong><\/p>\n
Dhand notes that 50% of research is unpublished. Rather than lacking scientific rigour, most rejections occur because journal editors consider the research to lack significance. A study prepared for the European Commission estimated that in 2018, \u20ac26 billion was wasted on duplicated research in Europe alone.<\/p>\n
\n
50% of funded research is unpublished. Rather than lacking scientific rigour, most rejections occur because journal editors consider the research to lack significance.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Value beyond citation metrics<\/strong><\/p>\n
Inclusive journals often publish a high number of papers, leading to lower impact factors. However, the value of the research can be measured by other metrics. For example, over a third of Springer Nature\u2019s inclusive content addresses the UN Sustainable Development Goals<\/a>, demonstrating its societal impact.<\/p>\n
Diversity in research publication <\/strong><\/p>\n
Inclusive publication practices also involve increasing the diversity of authors and countries contributing research. Dhand highlights that a similar proportion of research publications are from Western Nations and Asia, yet editorial boards and reviewers remain Western dominated. As key decision makers, individuals in these roles should reflect the diversity of the research communities.<\/p>\n
Dhand acknowledges that selective journals will continue to offer a platform for ground-breaking research, but highlights the need for widespread inclusive publication practices to satisfy the evolving needs of science and society.<\/p>\n
\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/thepublicationplan.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Aspirations_Erin-Dawn-Higgins_1.png?resize=1024%2C125&ssl=1\")
<\/p>\n